Vigre Lectures

Abstract

In mathematics, we back up our discoveries with rigorous deductive proofs. Mathematicians develop a keen instinctive sense of what makes a proof rigorous. In logic, we strive for a *theory* of rigorous proofs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Metamathematics, machines, and Gödel's proof.N. Shankar - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lectures on the history of political philosophy.John Rawls - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Edited by Samuel Richard Freeman.
Are rigorous evolutionary histories of human mating possible?Harmon R. Holcomb - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):606-607.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Socratic proofs.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):299-326.
Logic for mathematicians.Alan G. Hamilton - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
238 (#80,920)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references