What is the correct logic of necessity, actuality and apriority?

Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):385-414 (2014)
Abstract
This paper is concerned with a propositional modal logic with operators for necessity, actuality and apriority. The logic is characterized by a class of relational structures defined according to ideas of epistemic two-dimensional semantics, and can therefore be seen as formalizing the relations between necessity, actuality and apriority according to epistemic two-dimensional semantics. We can ask whether this logic is correct, in the sense that its theorems are all and only the informally valid formulas. This paper gives outlines of two arguments that jointly show that this is the case. The first is intended to show that the logic is informally sound, in the sense that all of its theorems are informally valid. The second is intended to show that it is informally complete, in the sense that all informal validities are among its theorems. In order to give these arguments, a number of independently interesting results concerning the logic are proven. In particular, the soundness and completeness of two proof systems with respect to the semantics is proven (Theorems 2.11 and 2.15), as well as a normal form theorem (Theorem 3.2), an elimination theorem for the actuality operator (Corollary 3.6), and the decidability of the logic (Corollary 3.7). It turns out that the logic invalidates a plausible principle concerning the interaction of apriority and necessity; consequently, a variant semantics is briefly explored on which this principle is valid. The paper concludes by assessing the implications of these results for epistemic two-dimensional semantics.
Keywords Modal logic  Necessity  Apriority  Actuality  Two-Dimensional Semantics  Nesting Problem
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1755020314000136
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):153-226.
Two Notions of Necessity.Martin Davies & Lloyd Humberstone - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (1):1-31.
Two-Dimensional Adventures.Lloyd Humberstone - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):17--65.
On the Concept of Following Logically.Alfred Tarski - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):155-196.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework.Martin Davies - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):83-131.
Hegel's Logic of Actuality.Karen Ng - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
Indexed Actuality.Yannis Stephanou - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):355-393.
Representing Counterparts.Andrew Bacon - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Logic 11 (2):90-113.
Actuality and Necessity.Pieranna Garavaso - 1992 - Journal of Critical Analysis 9 (2):35-40.
'Now' and 'Then' in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Elementary Definability and Completeness in General and Positive Modal Logic.Ernst Zimmermann - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (1):99-117.
Added to PP index
2012-09-09

Total downloads
408 ( #6,263 of 2,191,998 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #5,780 of 2,191,998 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature