What is the correct logic of necessity, actuality and apriority?

Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):385-414 (2014)
Authors
Peter Fritz
University of Oslo
Abstract
This paper is concerned with a propositional modal logic with operators for necessity, actuality and apriority. The logic is characterized by a class of relational structures defined according to ideas of epistemic two-dimensional semantics, and can therefore be seen as formalizing the relations between necessity, actuality and apriority according to epistemic two-dimensional semantics. We can ask whether this logic is correct, in the sense that its theorems are all and only the informally valid formulas. This paper gives outlines of two arguments that jointly show that this is the case. The first is intended to show that the logic is informally sound, in the sense that all of its theorems are informally valid. The second is intended to show that it is informally complete, in the sense that all informal validities are among its theorems. In order to give these arguments, a number of independently interesting results concerning the logic are proven. In particular, the soundness and completeness of two proof systems with respect to the semantics is proven (Theorems 2.11 and 2.15), as well as a normal form theorem (Theorem 3.2), an elimination theorem for the actuality operator (Corollary 3.6), and the decidability of the logic (Corollary 3.7). It turns out that the logic invalidates a plausible principle concerning the interaction of apriority and necessity; consequently, a variant semantics is briefly explored on which this principle is valid. The paper concludes by assessing the implications of these results for epistemic two-dimensional semantics.
Keywords Modal logic  Necessity  Apriority  Actuality  Two-Dimensional Semantics  Nesting Problem
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1755020314000136
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):153-226.
Two Notions of Necessity.Martin Davies & Lloyd Humberstone - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (1):1-31.
Squeezing Arguments.P. Smith - 2011 - Analysis 71 (1):22-30.
The Logic of What Might Have Been.Nathan Salmon - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (1):3-34.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework.Martin Davies - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):83-131.
Hegel's Logic of Actuality.Karen Ng - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
Indexed Actuality.Yannis Stephanou - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):355-393.
Representing Counterparts.Andrew Bacon - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Logic 11 (2):90-113.
Actuality and Necessity.Pieranna Garavaso - 1992 - Journal of Critical Analysis 9 (2):35-40.
'Now' and 'Then' in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Elementary Definability and Completeness in General and Positive Modal Logic.Ernst Zimmermann - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (1):99-117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-09

Total downloads
474 ( #6,099 of 2,268,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #9,396 of 2,268,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature