A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):310-329 (2012)
AbstractI have argued that orthographic processing cannot be understood and modeled without considering the manner in which orthographic structure represents phonological, semantic, and morphological information in a given writing system. A reading theory, therefore, must be a theory of the interaction of the reader with his/her linguistic environment. This outlines a novel approach to studying and modeling visual word recognition, an approach that focuses on the common cognitive principles involved in processing printed words across different writing systems. These claims were challenged by several commentaries that contested the merits of my general theoretical agenda, the relevance of the evolution of writing systems, and the plausibility of finding commonalities in reading across orthographies. Other commentaries extended the scope of the debate by bringing into the discussion additional perspectives. My response addresses all these issues. By considering the constraints of neurobiology on modeling reading, developmental data, and a large scope of cross-linguistic evidence, I argue that front-end implementations of orthographic processing that do not stem from a comprehensive theory of the complex information conveyed by writing systems do not present a viable approach for understanding reading. The common principles by which writing systems have evolved to represent orthographic, phonological, and semantic information in a language reveal the critical distributional characteristics of orthographic structure that govern reading behavior. Models of reading should thus be learning models, primarily constrained by cross-linguistic developmental evidence that describes how the statistical properties of writing systems shape the characteristics of orthographic processing. When this approach is adopted, a universal model of reading is possible
Similar books and articles
The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration.Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: cross-language and writing system transfer.Min Wang, Charles A. Perfetti & Ying Liu - 2005 - Cognition 97 (1):67-88.
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition.Carol Whitney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):309-310.
Explaining word recognition, reading, the universe, and beyond: A modest proposal.Jonathan Grainger & Thomas Hannagan - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):288-289.
Vision, development, and bilingualism are fundamental in the quest for a universal model of visual word recognition and reading.Nicola J. Pitchford, Walter J. B. van Heuven, Andrew N. Kelly, Taoli Zhang & Timothy Ledgeway - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):300-301.
Protein Analysis Meets Visual Word Recognition: A Case for String Kernels in the Brain.Thomas Hannagan & Jonathan Grainger - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (4):575-606.
Eye-movement control in reading: Models and predictions.Eyal M. Reingold - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):500-501.
Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading.Glyn W. Humphreys & Lindsay J. Evett - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):689-705.
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code.Colin J. Davis - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):283-284.
Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. [REVIEW]Min Wang, Keiko Koda & Charles A. Perfetti - 2003 - Cognition 87 (2):129-149.
The e-z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism.David L. Share - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):307-308.
Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough.Mark S. Seidenberg & Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):305.
Flashing out or fleshing out? A developmental perspective on a universal model of reading.Bruce D. Homer, Russell Miller & Seamus Donnelly - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):289-290.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
An ERP Study on the Role of Phonological Processing in Reading Two-Character Compound Chinese Words of High and Low Frequency.Yuling Wang, Minghu Jiang, Yunlong Huang & Peijun Qiu - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
The material difference in human cognition.Karenleigh Anne Overmann - 2021 - Adaptive Behavior 29 (2):123-136.
Orthographic units in the absence of visual processing: Evidence from sublexical structure in braille.Simon Fischer-Baum & Robert Englebretson - 2016 - Cognition 153 (C):161-174.
Early writing: A cognitive archaeological perspective on literacy and numeracy.Karenleigh Anne Overmann - 2022 - Visible Language 1 (56):8-44.
References found in this work
Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (15):258-260.