Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):310-329 (2012)

I have argued that orthographic processing cannot be understood and modeled without considering the manner in which orthographic structure represents phonological, semantic, and morphological information in a given writing system. A reading theory, therefore, must be a theory of the interaction of the reader with his/her linguistic environment. This outlines a novel approach to studying and modeling visual word recognition, an approach that focuses on the common cognitive principles involved in processing printed words across different writing systems. These claims were challenged by several commentaries that contested the merits of my general theoretical agenda, the relevance of the evolution of writing systems, and the plausibility of finding commonalities in reading across orthographies. Other commentaries extended the scope of the debate by bringing into the discussion additional perspectives. My response addresses all these issues. By considering the constraints of neurobiology on modeling reading, developmental data, and a large scope of cross-linguistic evidence, I argue that front-end implementations of orthographic processing that do not stem from a comprehensive theory of the complex information conveyed by writing systems do not present a viable approach for understanding reading. The common principles by which writing systems have evolved to represent orthographic, phonological, and semantic information in a language reveal the critical distributional characteristics of orthographic structure that govern reading behavior. Models of reading should thus be learning models, primarily constrained by cross-linguistic developmental evidence that describes how the statistical properties of writing systems shape the characteristics of orthographic processing. When this approach is adopted, a universal model of reading is possible
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12000635
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Ann S. Ferebee - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):167.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Models and Predictions.Eyal M. Reingold - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):500-501.
Writing Systems: Not Optimal, but Good Enough.Mark S. Seidenberg & Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):305.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #307,712 of 2,446,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes