Getting Beyond Pros and Cons: Results of a Stakeholder Needs Assessment on Physician Assisted Dying in the Hospital Setting

HEC Forum 34 (4):391-408 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study assessed the attitudes and needs of physicians and health professional staff at a tertiary care hospital in Canada regarding the introduction of physician assisted dying (PAD) during 2015–16. This research aimed to develop an understanding of the wishes, concerns and hopes of stakeholders related to handling requests for PAD; to determine what supports/structures/resources health care professionals (HCP) require in order to ensure high quality and compassionate care for patients requesting PAD, and a supportive environment for all healthcare providers across the moral spectrum. This study constituted a mixed methods design with a qualitative descriptive approach for the study’s qualitative component. A total of 303 HCPs working in a tertiary care hospital completed an online survey and 64 HCPs working in hospital units with high mortality rates participated in 8 focus group discussions. Both focus group and survey data coalesced around several themes to support the implementation of PAD following the decriminalization of this practice: the importance of high quality care; honoring moral diversity; supporting values (such as autonomy, privacy, beneficence); and developing resources, including collaboration with palliative care, education, policies and a specialized team. This study provided the foundational evidence to support the development of the PAD program described in other papers in this collection, and can be a model for gathering evidence from stakeholders to inform the implementation of PAD in any healthcare organization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

PHYSICIAN ASSISTED DYING: DEFINING THE ETHICALLY AMBIGUOUS.Chandler O'Leary - 2018 - Aletheia, The Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy at Texas AandM 1:18-26.
Physician-Assisted Suicide: Where to Draw the Line?Ernlé W. D. Young - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):407-410.
“medical Friendships” In Assisted Dying.Chalmers Clark & Gerrit Kimsa - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):61-67.
“Medical Friendships” in Assisted Dying.Chalmers C. Clark & Gerrit K. Kimsma - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):61-67.
Some pros and cons of Madhva's Scriptural Interpretations and Doctrines.B. N. Hebbar - 2015 - Journal of Indian Philosophy and Religion 20:94-109.
Unreconcilable Differences?Bruce Jennings - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 41 (4):4-9.
Physician-assisted dying: thoughts drawn from Albert Camus’ writing.Claudia Bozzaro - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (2):111-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-24

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Les Murray
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale