Review of Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism [Book Review]

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5) (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


For much of the second half of the 20th Century, the primary role logical empiricism played was that of the argumentative foil. The 'received view' on a given topic (especially in philosophy of science, logic, or language) was frequently identified with some supposedly dogmatic tenet of logical empiricism. However, during the last twenty-five years, scholars have paid serious, sustained attention to what the logical positivists, individually and collectively, actually said. Early scholarship on logical empiricism had to engage in heavy-duty PR work: why should anyone study the now-discarded mixture of blunders and implausibilities collected under the label 'logical empiricism'? However, thanks to the efforts of the pioneers, people studying the logical empiricists today need not articulate an extended apologia for their chosen subject of study -- rather, they can simply get on with their work. Many of the best fruits of these recent labors are on display in The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism (CCLE), edited by Alan Richardson and Thomas Uebel.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

34 (#471,489)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Frost-Arnold
Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references