Synopsis and discussion. Workshop: Underdetermination in science 21-22 March, 2009. Center for philosophy of science
Greg Frost-Arnold, J. Brian Pitts, John Norton, John Manchak, Dana Tulodziecki, P. D. Magnus, David Harker & Kyle Stanford
AbstractThis document collects discussion and commentary on issues raised in the workshop by its participants. Contributors are: Greg Frost-Arnold, David Harker, P. D. Magnus, John Manchak, John D. Norton, J. Brian Pitts, Kyle Stanford, Dana Tulodziecki
Similar books and articles
Session 4: Evolutionary indeterminism.Robert Brandon, Alan Love, Paul Griffths & Frederic Bouchard - manuscript
The identical rivals response to underdetermination.Greg Frost-Arnold & P. D. Magnus - 2009 - In P. D. Magnus Jacob Busch (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Synopsis and discussion: Philosophy of gauge theory.Gordon Belot, John Earman, Richard Healey, Tim Maudlin, Antigone Nounou & Ward Struyve - manuscript
Synopsis of the Robert and Sarah Boote conference in reductionism and anti-reductionism in physics.Nicholaos Jones & Kevin Coffey - unknown
Session 2: Female orgasms and evolutionary theory.Elisabeth Lloyd, Karen Arnold, Sandra D. Mitchell & Wendy Parker - manuscript
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Demystifying underdetermination.Larry Laudan - 1990 - In C. Wade Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 267-97.
Must evidence underdetermine theory.John D. Norton - 2003 - The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice:17--44.
There Are No Universal Rules for Induction.John D. Norton - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):765-777.