Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):665-673 (2012)
This paper challenges the claim that science is metaphysically neutral upheld by contenders of the separation of peacefully co-existent science and religion and by evolutionary theists. True, naturalistic metaphysical claims can neither be refuted nor proved and are thus distinct from empirical hypotheses. However, metaphysical assumptions not only regulate the theoretical and empirical study of nature, but are increasingly supported by the growing empirical body of science. This historically evolving interaction has contributed to the development of a naturalistic worldview that renounces the necessity of a transcendent god and of purposeful design. The thesis presented here differs not only from the claims of the “separatists” and of evolutionary theists. In pointing to the metaphysical aspects of science, I also criticize the failure of some evolutionary naturalists to distinguish between empirical and metaphysical contentions. Most important, based on the examination of science suggested here, creationists’ false accusation that science is only a naturalistic dogma is refuted. Finally, the difficulties involved in the position endorsed here for the public support of evolution are acknowledged, taking into account the high religious profile of the American society and the social and political context in the US and in other countries
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Is the Theory of Natural Selection Independent of its History.Gregory Radick - 2003 - In J. Hodges & Gregory Radick (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 143--167.
Making Room for Faith in an Age of Science: A Response to David Wisdo.Michael Ruse - 2011 - Zygon 46 (3):655-672.
Michael Ruse on Science and Faith: Seeking Mutual Understanding.David Wisdo - 2011 - Zygon 46 (3):639-654.
Citations of this work BETA
Naturalizing Theorizing: Beyond a Theory of Biological Theories. [REVIEW]Werner Callebaut - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):413-429.
Similar books and articles
“Mind is Brain” is Trivial and Nonscientific in Both Neurobiology and Cognitive Science.J. Scott Jordan - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):842-842.
Interpreting the Notion That Technology is Value-Neutral.Per Sundström - 1998 - Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (1):41-45.
The Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories.Michael R. Dietrich & Roberta L. Millstein - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):548-559.
Some Laws of Nature Are Metaphysically Contingent.John Roberts - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):445-457.
On Biological Identity.Giovanni Boniolo & Massimiliano Carrara - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (3):443-457.
What in the World Are the Ways Things Might Have Been? [REVIEW]Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (3):443 - 453.
Stalnaker on the Interaction of Modality with Quantification and Identity.Timothy Williamson - 2006 - In Judith Jarvis Thomson & Alex Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford University Press.
Why 'Nonexistent People' Do Not Have Zero Wellbeing but No Wellbeing at All.Ori J. Herstein - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):136-145.
Susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer Illusion, Theory-Neutral Observation, and the Diachronic Penetrability of the Visual Input System.Robert N. McCauley & J. Henrich - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):79-101.
Agent-Neutral Consequentialism From the Inside-Out: Concern for Integrity Without Self-Indulgence.Michael Ridge - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (2):236.
Added to index2012-07-07
Total downloads39 ( #126,828 of 2,146,939 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,177 of 2,146,939 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.