This paper studies the framework for Internet regulation in the United States, Europe and China. Focusing on co-regulatory mechanisms, it analyses the legal tools used by governments in order to entrust private 'points of control' to monitor Internet. It focuses more specifically on the impact of co-regulation on the rule of law and on the emergence of a transnational struggle for law between global players.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What Can Prudent Public Regulators Learn From the United Kingdom Government's Nanotechnological Regulatory Activities?Bärbel R. Dorbeck-Jung - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (3):257-270.
Sticks and Stones and Words That Harm: Liability Vs. Responsibility, Section 230 and Defamatory Speech in Cyberspace. [REVIEW]Tomas A. Lipinski, Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Johannes J. Britz - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2):143-158.
Privacy Rights on the Internet: Self-Regulation or Government Regulation?Norman E. Bowie & Karim Jamal - 2006 - Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (3):323-342.
Gender, Race, and the Regulation of Native Identity in Canada and the United States: An Overview.Bonita Lawrence - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (2):3-31.
Scientific Self-Regulation—so Good, How Can It Fail?Patrick L. Taylor - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):395-406.
What is so Bad About Internet Content Regulation?John Weckert - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):105-111.
Global Democratic Transformation and the Internet.Carol C. Gould - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:73-88.
The Obscenity of Internet Regulation in the United States.A. White - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):111-119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #593,580 of 2,158,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?