Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16 (3):227-243 (2018)

Authors
Richard J. Fry
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
This paper situates Hume's views on animals in the context of the Scottish Enlightenment by contrasting them with the views of Adam Smith. While Smith is more central to the philosophical establishment of the Scottish Enlightenment, their views on morals resemble each other greatly and both think that the analogies between humans and non-human animals are useful for thinking about morals. Their estimation of the nature and extent of those analogies, however, differ widely from one another. This has been historically obscured by the fact that in no single work does Smith precisely detail what he thinks non-human animals are capable of. I argue that Smith thinks non-human animal minds are different in kind from human minds. This is evident from Smith's view of how language facilitates and co-creates certain aspects of human cognition. Hume, by contrast, seems to hold that non-human animal minds differ merely by degree from human minds. After reconstructing Smith's view, I contrast it with Hume's, providing historical context to show how Hume falls outside the mainstream on this issue and Smith within it. Their views on animals reflect, broadly, their standing with respect to the wider Scottish philosophical community.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/jsp.2018.0205
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hume on the Nonhuman Animal.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):322 – 335.
Hume on Animal Reason.Deborah Boyle - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):3-28.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Instinct in David Hume's Conception of Human Reason.James Hill - 2020 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 18 (3):273-288.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science, Knowledge, and Animal Minds.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):79–102.
Animal Minds.Fred Dretske - 2001 - Philosophic Exchange 31 (1).
Animal Minds, Human Minds.Eric Saidel - 2002 - In Marc Bekoff, Colin Allen & Gordon M. Burghardt (eds.), The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. MIT Press. pp. 53--58.
Animal Minds: Beyond Cognition to Consciousness. [REVIEW]L. Kemmerer - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (4):475-478.
How Prejudice Affects the Study of Animal Minds.Keefner Ashley - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo
Hume's Belief in Other Minds.Anik Waldow - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):119 – 132.
Phenomenology and the Problem of Animal Minds.Simon P. James - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):33 - 49.
Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.B. M. Laing - 1937 - Philosophy 12 (46):175 - 190.
Models, Mechanisms, and Animal Minds.Colin Allen - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (S1):75-97.
Hume on Animal Reason.Deborah Boyle - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):3-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-24

Total views
20 ( #544,170 of 2,461,943 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,943 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes