The separation of the legislative, executive and judiciary powers is a key principle in most democratic constitutions. We analyze the costs and benefits of separating legislature and executive in an incomplete contracts model: The executive can decide to implement public projects. Under separation of powers, the legislature sets up a decision-making framework that leaves the executive with the residual decision-making rights. Separation of powers is the more beneficial, the larger the danger of extreme policy preferences of the residual political decision-maker.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat.Hilary Bok - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Separation of Governmental Powers.Cornelius P. Ford - 1933 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):588-601.
Managing Business Ethics and Opportunity Costs.Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):835-842.
The Progressive Origins of the Administrative State: Wilson, Goodnow, and Landis.Ronald J. Pestritto - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):16-54.
Healthcare Ethics: A Patient-Centered Decision Model. [REVIEW]Alfonso R. Oddo - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):125 - 134.
Separation of Powers in the European Union's Intertwined System of Government - a Treaty Based Analysis for the Use of Political Scientists and Constitutional Lawyers.Jacques Ziller - unknown
Men of Class: Aristotle, Montesquieu and Dicey on 'Separation of Powers' and 'the Rule of Law'.Iain M. Stewart - manuscript
Added to index2009-05-17
Total downloads12 ( #376,534 of 2,169,121 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,573 of 2,169,121 )
How can I increase my downloads?