Overselling the case against normativism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):255-255 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Though we are in broad agreement with much of Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) position, we criticize two aspects of their argument. First, rejecting normativism is unlikely to yield the benefits that E&E seek. Second, their conception of rational norms is overly restrictive and, as a consequence, their arguments at most challenge a relatively restrictive version of normativism



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The concept of health: beyond normativism and naturalism.Richard P. Hamilton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):323-329.
A case for limited prescriptive normativism.Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):264-265.
A role for normativism.Igor Douven - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):252-253.
Resisting normativism in psychology.Georges Rey - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
The Overselling Of Genetic Anxiety.Madeleine J. Goodman - 1982 - Hastings Center Report 12 (5):20-27.


Added to PP

1,706 (#5,875)

6 months
15 (#170,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Richard Samuels
Ohio State University
Tim Fuller
Ohio State University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemology and cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1993 - Princeton University Press.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1993 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 186 (1):187-189.

View all 8 references / Add more references