She Came to Stay and _Being and Nothingness_

Hypatia 14 (4):50-69 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay, using works by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Hazel Barnes, and Elizabeth Fallaize, documents the correspondence between the philosophical content of Beauvoir's She Came to Stay and Sartre's Being and Nothingness. After reviewing the existential/phenomenological philosophical method, this paper examines the two philosophers’ letters and diaries to show that Beauvoir wrote her book before Sartre wrote his and that the distinctive ideas and arguments the two works share originated with Beauvoir.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
27 (#142,020)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

L'Être et le Néant.J. -P. Sartre - 1943 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 49 (2):183-184.
Cézanne's Doubt.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - In Sense and Non-Sense. [Evanston, Ill.]: Northwestern University Press. pp. 1-25.
L'Être et le Néant : essai d'ontologie phénoménologique.J. P. Sartre - 1942 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 133 (10):177-179.
L'Être et le Néant, Essaid' Ontologiephénoménologique.Jean-Paul Sartre - 1948 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 2 (4):610-619.

View all 28 references / Add more references