The Art of Being Human: A Project for General Philosophy of Science [Book Review]

Abstract
Throughout the medieval and modern periods, in various sacred and secular guises, the unification of all forms of knowledge under the rubric of ‘science’ has been taken as the prerogative of humanity as a species. However, as our sense of species privilege has been called increasingly into question, so too has the very salience of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’ as general categories, let alone ones that might bear some essential relationship to each other. After showing how the ascendant Stanford School in the philosophy of science has contributed to this joint demystification of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’, I proceed on a more positive note to a conceptual framework for making sense of science as the art of being human. My understanding of ‘science’ is indebted to the red thread that runs from Christian theology through the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment to the Humboldtian revival of the university as the site for the synthesis of knowledge as the culmination of self-development. Especially salient to this idea is science‘s epistemic capacity to manage modality (i.e. to determine the conditions under which possibilities can be actualised) and its political capacity to organize humanity into projects of universal concern. However, the challenge facing such an ideal in the twentyfirst century is that the predicate ‘human’ may be projected in three quite distinct ways, governed by what I call ‘ecological’, ‘biomedical’ and ‘cybernetic’ interests. Which one of these future humanities would claim today’s humans as proper ancestors and could these futures co-habit the same world thus become two important questions that general philosophy of science will need to address in the coming years.
Keywords Humanity  Modality  Epistemic justice  Projectibility  Social epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-012-9181-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Objective Knowledge.Karl R. Popper - 1972 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Philosophy: A New Knowledge and an Alternative Political Science.Thalia Fung - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:23-27.
The Redemption of Science.Anatol Rapoport - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):157 - 165.
What is General Philosophy of Science?Stathis Psillos - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):93-103.
On “Bettering Humanity” in Science and Engineering Education.James A. Stieb - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):265-273.
Science and the Quest for Meaning.Alfred I. Tauber - 2009 - Baylor University Press.
Common Humanity and Human Rights.Jeremy Bendik-Keymer - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
Is Science Neurotic?Nicholas Maxwell - 2004 - Imperial College Press.
Science Without Laws.Ronald N. Giere - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-29

Total downloads

22 ( #218,859 of 2,146,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,103 of 2,146,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums