Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):113-123 (2012)
Throughout the medieval and modern periods, in various sacred and secular guises, the unification of all forms of knowledge under the rubric of ‘science’ has been taken as the prerogative of humanity as a species. However, as our sense of species privilege has been called increasingly into question, so too has the very salience of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’ as general categories, let alone ones that might bear some essential relationship to each other. After showing how the ascendant Stanford School in the philosophy of science has contributed to this joint demystification of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’, I proceed on a more positive note to a conceptual framework for making sense of science as the art of being human. My understanding of ‘science’ is indebted to the red thread that runs from Christian theology through the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment to the Humboldtian revival of the university as the site for the synthesis of knowledge as the culmination of self-development. Especially salient to this idea is science‘s epistemic capacity to manage modality (i.e. to determine the conditions under which possibilities can be actualised) and its political capacity to organize humanity into projects of universal concern. However, the challenge facing such an ideal in the twentyfirst century is that the predicate ‘human’ may be projected in three quite distinct ways, governed by what I call ‘ecological’, ‘biomedical’ and ‘cybernetic’ interests. Which one of these future humanities would claim today’s humans as proper ancestors and could these futures co-habit the same world thus become two important questions that general philosophy of science will need to address in the coming years.
|Keywords||Humanity Modality Epistemic justice Projectibility Social epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philosophy: A New Knowledge and an Alternative Political Science.Thalia Fung - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:23-27.
Environmental Alchemy: How to Turn Ecological Science Into Ecological Philosophy.Kevin de Laplante - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (4):361-380.
What's Wrong with Science?: Towards a People's Rational Science of Delight and Compassion.Nicholas Maxwell - 1976 - Bran's Head Books.
What is General Philosophy of Science?Stathis Psillos - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):93-103.
Philosophy of Science in the Twenty-First Century.P. D. Magnus - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):48-52.
What’s Wrong With Science? Towards a People’s Rational Science of Delight and Compassion, Second Edition.Nicholas Maxwell - 2009 - Pentire Press.
Philosophy of Ecology.Kevin deLaplante, Bryson Brown & Kent A. Peacock (eds.) - 2011 - North-Holland.
On “Bettering Humanity” in Science and Engineering Education.James A. Stieb - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):265-273.
Added to index2012-02-29
Total downloads22 ( #218,859 of 2,146,490 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,103 of 2,146,490 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.