Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times

University of Chicago Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work discusses whether Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was revolutionary. Steve Fuller argues that Kuhn held a profoundly conservative view of science and how one ought to study its history.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Steve Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. [REVIEW]F. Remedios - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):97-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
88 (#255,653)

6 months
7 (#613,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Fuller
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thought styles and paradigms—a comparative study of Ludwik Fleck and Thomas S. Kuhn.Nicola Mößner - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):362–371.
Social Epistemology: A Quarter-Century Itinerary.Steve Fuller - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):267-283.
From Fleck's denkstil to Kuhn's paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability.Babette E. Babich - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):75 – 92.

View all 96 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysics and the new science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David C. Lindberg & Robert S. Westman, Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:). Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.

Add more references