Rawlsian Primary Goods and CSR

Abstract
John Rawls defines “primary social goods” to be the benefits of social co-operation that are valuable no matter what one’s life-plan. The benefit for international trade of talking in terms of primary goods is that such goods represent a fixed or standard rate, and thus facilitate efficient negotiation. The difficulty, however, is that such discussions appear to ignore, and thereby do violence to, significant cross-cultural value differences. I argue that an appropriate view of Rawlsian primary goods helps to facilitate inter-subjective agreement about what constitutes an advantage to the least advantaged. I illustrate this in a case study of the PT Freeport mining operations in Papua New Guinea
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1935-1178  
DOI icr200943
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,678
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Behind the Veil of Ignorance.János Kis - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):131-159.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Is Pogge a Capability Theorist in Disguise?Ilse Oosterlaken - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):205-215.
A Critique of the Incentives Argument for Inequalities.Max Seeger - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):40-52.
Categorizing Goods.Julie Tannenbaum - 2010 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol 5. Oxford University Press.
Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental Ethics.John Nolt - 2010 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):162 – 182.
Luck, Genes, and Equality.Dov Fox - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (4):712-726.
Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total downloads
17 ( #327,742 of 2,236,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #190,765 of 2,236,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature