Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science
In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 251-274 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
What's Wrong with Quantitative Risk Assessment?Dale Hattis & John A. Smith - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:375 -.
Food safety, quality, and ethics – a post-normal perspective.Jerome R. Ravetz - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):255-265.
Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment.Carl F. Cranor - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:467 - 488.
What's Really Wrong with Quantitative Risk Assessment?Helen E. Longino - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:376 - 383.
Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment.Douglas MacLean - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Toward a More Objective Understanding of the Evidence of Carcinogenic Risk.Deborah G. Mayo - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:489 - 503.
Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.
Post-normal science, the precautionary principle and the ethics of integrity.Laura Westra - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):237-262.
The ethics of truth-telling and the problem of risk.Paul B. Thompson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):489-510.
Valuing risk: The ethical review of clinical trial safety.Jonathan Kimmelman - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):369-393.
Science and values in risk assessment: The case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms. [REVIEW]Soemini Kasanmoentalib - 1996 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1):42-60.
The Power of a Propositional Constant.Robert Goldblatt & Tomasz Kowalski - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (1):1-20.
Science, democracy, and public policy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2-3):255-264.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-21
Downloads
20 (#565,234)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2012-08-21
Downloads
20 (#565,234)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science.Kyle Powys Whyte & Robert Crease - 2010 - Synthese 177 (3):411-425.
Technocracy, Democracy, and U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations.Myanna Lahsen - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (1):137-169.
Conceptual Questions and Challenges Associated with the Traditional Risk Assessment Paradigm for Nanomaterials.Jutta Jahnel - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (3):261-276.
Would You Mind, If We Record This? Perceptions on Regulation and Responsibility among Indian Nanoscientists.Subhasis Sahoo - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):231-249.
Reflexive Modernization and Beyond.Luigi Pellizzoni - 1999 - Theory, Culture and Society 16 (4):99-125.
