A proposal for modernizing the regulation of human biotechnologies

Hastings Center Report 37 (4):16-20 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: The technologies at the intersection of assisted reproduction and genetics call for a new regulatory approach, say Franco Furger and Francis Fukuyama, authors of the recent report Beyond Bioethics. In the essay below they map out their recommendation. In the following essays, James Fossett argues that regulation is likelier—and would be better—at the state level, Leonard Fleck calls for more robust public involvement, and John Robertson recommends sticking with the status quo. Turning from procedural to substantive issues, Josephine Johnston takes up Furger and Fukuyama’s suggestion that children have a right to a traditional genetic parentage

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The regulation of biotechnologies: Four recommendations.Dov Fox - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (2):3-3.
Genetic Enhancement, Human Nature, and Rights.T. Mcconnell - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):415-428.
Paradoxes of Industry Self-Regulation.Lawrence J. Lad - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:259-262.
New technologies and human rights.Thérèse Murphy (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#237,519)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Three ways to politicize bioethics.Mark B. Brown - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references