The Latin Avicenna and Aquinas on the Relationship between God and the Subject of Metaphysics

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:129-140 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper examines and compares the ways in which the Latin Avicenna, that is the Persian thinker’s work as known in Latin translation to medieval Christianthinkers, and Aquinas alter Aristotle’s conception of the breadth and scope of the subject of metaphysics. These two medieval philosophers inherited the problem that Aristotle posed in the Metaphysics concerning the relationship between the study of being as being and the natural study of God. Both thinkers reject the idea that God is the subject of metaphysics and maintain that the one subject of this science is being qua being. They differ, however, in their analysis of the relationship between this subject and God. Avicenna does not directly address this problem, but certain passages from the Liber de prima philosophia seem to suggest, and were interpreted during the middle ages as suggesting, that God falls within the scope of being qua being. Aquinas, on the other hand, analyzes this relationship in detail and firmly denies that God falls within the scope of the subject of metaphysics.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God.R. Houser - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):355 - 375.
Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Their Use of Avicenna in Clarifying the Subject of Metaphysics.John F. Wippel - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2:15-26.
On Whether Aquinas’s Ipsum Esse Is “Platonism”.Stephen L. Brock - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303.
The metaphysics of The healing: a parallel English-Arabic text = al-Ilahīyāt min al-Shifāʼ. Avicenna - 2004 - Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press. Edited by Michael E. Marmura.
God’s Knowledge of Particulars.Kevjn Lim - 2009 - Journal of Islamic Philosophy 5:75-98.
The trinitarian indwelling.Robert L. Faricy - 1971 - The Thomist 35 (3):369 - 404.
Santo Tomás y el motor inmóvil.David Torrijos Castrillejo - 2011 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 18:123-136.


Added to PP

66 (#238,925)

6 months
6 (#470,955)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Furlong
Valencia College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references