Hypatia 3 (3):62 - 80 (1988)

Luce Irigaray's fearlessness towards speaking the body has earned for her work the dismissive label "essentialist." But Irigaray's Speculum de l'autre femme and Ce Sexe qui n'en est pas un suggest that essence may not be the unitary, monolithic, in short, essentialist category that anti-essentialists so often presume it to be. Irigaray strategically deploys essentialism for at least two reasons: first, to reverse and to displace Jacques Lacan's phallomorphism; and second, to expose the contradiction at the heart of Aristotelian metaphysics which denies women access to "Essence" while at the same time positing the essence of "Woman" precisely as non-essential (as matter).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1989
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00189.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

This Sex Which Is Not One.Luce Irigaray - 1985 - Cornell University Press.
Speculum of the Other Woman.Luce Irigaray - 1985 - Cornell University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Two Subjects’ Dialectics in Luce Irigaray’s Philosophy.Ieva Lapinska - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:45-53.
Questions to Luce Irigaray.Kate Ince - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #192,107 of 2,444,956 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,444,956 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes