Farewell to Suppression-Freedom

Logica Universalis 14 (3):297-330 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Val Plumwood and Richard Sylvan argued from their joint paper The Semantics of First Degree Entailment and onward that the variable sharing property is but a mere consequence of a good entailment relation, indeed they viewed it as a mere negative test of adequacy of such a relation, the property itself being a rather philosophically barren concept. Such a relation is rather to be analyzed as a sufficiency relation free of any form of premise suppression. Suppression of premises, therefore, gained center stage. Despite this, however, no serious attempt was ever made at analyzing the concept. This paper shows that their suggestions for how to understand it, either as the Anti-Suppression Principle or as the Joint Force Principle, turn out to yield properties strictly weaker than that of variable sharing. A suggestion for how to understand some of their use of the notion of suppression which clearly is not in line with these two mentioned principles is given, and their arguments to the effect that the Anderson and Belnap logics T, E and R are suppressive are shown to be both technically and philosophically wanting. Suppression-freedom, it is argued, cannot do the job Plumwood and Sylvan intended it to do.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Suppressive Educational Activity is the Future of Modern Russian Educational.N. I. Makarova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:189-193.
Repression, Suppression, and Oppression (in Depression).Shahar Golan - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):533-534.


Added to PP

16 (#662,794)

6 months
4 (#172,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tore Fjetland Øgaard
University of Bergen

Citations of this work

What is a Relevant Connective?Shawn Standefer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):919-950.

Add more citations