Stance 15:78-87 (2022)
AbstractBased on Eli Alshanetsky’s work Articulating a Thought, in this paper, I present a reconstructed puzzle involving complex thoughts and a method for how to tackle articulating them. Then, I reconstruct and provide objections to Alshanetsky’s favored view with rationality. I expound on an initially overlooked deflationary view that is arguably much more viable, while also adding a layer of nuance and granularity to the view that affirms its place in solving the puzzle. I reach the conclusion that if articulation is simply a medium for us to express our complex unfinished thoughts, then perhaps it isn’t necessary for us to clarify the thought.
Similar books and articles
Speaking for Thinking: “Thinking for Speaking” Reconsidered.Agustin Vicente - forthcoming - In Pablo Fossa (ed.), Inner Speech, Culture & Education. Springer.
Orte des Philosophischen Denkens.Tilman Borsche - 2015 - Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 40 (2-3).
Thinking: From Solitude to Dialogue and Contemplation.Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak - 2006 - Fordham University Press.
How Can We Think the Complex?Carlos Gershenson & Francis Heylighen - 2004 - In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished).
Ethics at the Boundary: Beginning with Foucault.Charles E. Scott - 2011 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (2):203-212.
Teaching Philosophy with the Approach of Training "Critical Thinking" and It's Comparison with the Method of Ibn Sina.Jamileh Fatemi - 2014 - Avicennian Philosophy Journal 18 (51):57-76.
A Research On Thinking Types.Yang Zu-li & Tian-wen Wang - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:93-100.
Agostinho, Anselmo e Kilwardby Sobre a Linguagem Mental.José Filipe Silva - 2009 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (34):157-179.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads