- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reference-dependent rankings of sets in characteristics space
Social Choice and Welfare 37 (4):717-728 (2011)
Abstract
This article uses Lancaster's characteristics approach to rank sets of alternative combinations of commodity characteristics. It is assumed that there exists a reference point or reference level from which the individual evaluates set expansions in appropriate directions. We provide an axiomatic characterization for such a case.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Evaluating sets of objects in characteristics space.Wulf Gaertner - 2011 - Social Choice and Welfare 39 (2-3):303-321.
Churchland's metamers.Rolf G. Kuehni & C. L. Hardin - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):81-92.
In defence of object-dependent thoughts.Sean Crawford - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):201-210.
Unmatched chains and the representation of plural pronouns.Mark C. Baker - 1992 - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):33-73.
Sorry to Burst Your Bubble: The Influence of Reputation Rankings on Perceptions of Firms.Sohvi Leih & Michael L. Barnett - 2018 - Business and Society 57 (5):962-978.
Reference point-dependent tradeoffs in intertemporal decision making.X. T. Wang & Jeffrey S. Simons - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):663-664.
Sets and Point-Sets: Five Grades of Set-Theoretic Involvement in Geometry.John P. Burgess - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:456 - 463.
On existence of complete sets for bounded reducibilities.Valeriy Bulitko & Vadim Bulitko - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (6):567-575.
Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither?Manfred Krifka - 2003 - Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13:180.
What Does it Take to Refer?Kent Bach - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 516--554.
Properties of ideals on the generalized Cantor spaces.Jan Kraszewski - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1303-1320.
On Some Complexity Characteristics of Immune Sets.Valeriy K. Bulitko - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (3):307-313.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-02-19
Downloads
5 (#1,180,379)
6 months
1 (#486,551)
2019-02-19
Downloads
5 (#1,180,379)
6 months
1 (#486,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7cdd687c8d-79zxv N