Quaestiones Disputatae 8 (2):87-111 (2018)

Logan Paul Gage
Franciscan University of Steubenville
It is still a live question in epistemology and philosophy of science as to what exactly evidence is. In my view, evidence consists in experiences called “seemings.” This view is a version of the phenomenal conception of evidence, the position that evidence consists in nonfactive mental states with propositional content. This conception is opposed by sense-data theorists, disjunctivists, and those who think evidence consists in physical objects or publicly observable states of affairs—call it the courtroom conception of evidence. Thomas Kelly has recently argued that the phenomenal conception cannot play all the roles evidence plays and is thus inadequate. Having first explained the nature of seemings, in this essay I utilize Kelly’s own understanding of the four major roles of evidence and argue that the phenomenal conception can play each one. Experience is a good candidate for evidence.
Keywords Seemings  Evidence  Thomas Kelly
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2150-5756
DOI 10.5840/qd2018826
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In John Hawthorne & Tamar Gendler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.
Justification and Truth.Stewart Cohen - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (3):279--95.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Saint for Our Times: Newman on Faith, Fallibility, and Certitude.Logan Paul Gage - 2020 - Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 23 (2):60-76.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Evidentialism.Doesik Kim - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Mechanisms: What Are They Evidence for in Evidence-Based Medicine?Holly Andersen - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):992-999.
The Astoundingly Persuasive Argument From Experience.Demaree Eric (ed.) - 2017 - Kingman, Arizona, USA: Fellowship Books.
Truthy Psychologism About Evidence.Veli Mitova - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):1105-1126.
Rationality and Total Evidence.Andrew McLaughlin - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):271-278.
The Unity and Disunity of Agency.Jeanette Kennett & Steve Matthews - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (4):308-312.
Evidence and What We Make of It.Logan Paul Gage - 2014 - Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (2):89-99.


Added to PP index

Total views
263 ( #37,178 of 2,454,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #34,019 of 2,454,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes