PC: Response to Critics

In John M. DePoe & Tyler Dalton McNabb, Debating Christian Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 98-106 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, Gage and McAllister respond to various objections to the phenomenal conservative position in religious epistemology. In particular, they respond to the objections that seemings are the ultimate source of justification, that PC makes epistemic justification too easy, that PC involves conceptual circularity, and that PC lacks an objective connection to truth.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenal conservatism and evidentialism in religious epistemology.Chris Tucker - 2011 - In Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark, Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 52--73.
Evidence is Required for Religious Belief.Blake McAllister - 2019 - In Michael Peterson & Ray VanArragon, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edition. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-278.
Seeming and reflective awareness.Blake McAllister - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-02

Downloads
351 (#89,669)

6 months
107 (#67,403)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Logan Paul Gage
Franciscan University of Steubenville
Blake McAllister
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references