Vagueness, tolerance and contextual logic

Synthese 174 (1):5 - 46 (2010)
The goal of this paper is a comprehensive analysis of basic reasoning patterns that are characteristic of vague predicates. The analysis leads to rigorous reconstructions of the phenomena within formal systems. Two basic features are dealt with. One is tolerance: the insensitivity of predicates to small changes in the objects of predication (a one-increment of a walking distance is a walking distance). The other is the existence of borderline cases. The paper shows why these should be treated as different, though related phenomena. Tolerance is formally reconstructed within a proposed framework of contextual logic, leading to a solution of the Sorites paradox. Borderline-vagueness is reconstructed using certain modality operators; the set-up provides an analysis of higher order vagueness and a derivation of scales of degrees for the property in question.
Keywords Vagueness  Tolerance  Contextual logic  Semantic indeterminacy  Sorites paradox  Higher order vagueness  Degrees
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9683-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - Routledge.
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Vagueness, Truth and Logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Can There Be Vague Objects?Gareth Evans - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):208.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach.Igor Douven, Lieven Decock, Richard Dietz & Paul Égré - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):137-160.
Vagueness: Why Do We Believe in Tolerance?Paul Égré - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-17.
The Impossibility of Vagueness.Kit Fine - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):111-136.
The Possibility of Vagueness.Kit Fine - forthcoming - Synthese.
Reasoning with Slippery Predicates.Stewart Shapiro - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (3):313-336.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.
Vagueness as Closeness.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):157 – 183.
A Model of Tolerance.Elia Zardini - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (3):337-368.
Demoting Higher-Order Vagueness.Diana Raffman - 2009 - In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 509--22.
Vagueness: A Minimal Theory.Patrick Greenough - 2003 - Mind 112 (446):235-281.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
177 ( #26,535 of 2,191,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,668 of 2,191,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature