A Naturalistic Argument for the Irreducibility of Collective Intentionality

Abstract
According to many philosophers and scientists, human sociality is explained by our unique capacity to “share” attitudes with others. The conditions under which mental states are shared have been widely debated in the past two decades, focusing especially on the issue of their reducibility to individual intentionality and the place of collective intentions in the natural realm. It is not clear, however, to what extent these two issues are related and what methodologies of investigation are appropriate in each case. In this article, I propose a solution that distinguishes between epistemic and ontological interpretations of the demand for the conditions of reduction of collective intentionality. While the philosophical debate has contributed important insights into the former, recent advances in the cognitive sciences offer novel resources to tackle the latter. Drawing on Michael Tomasello’s research in the ontogeny of shared intentionality in early instances of interaction based on joint attention, I propose an empirically informed argument of what it would take to address the ontological question of irreducibility, thus making a step forward in the naturalization of collective intentionality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393111426864
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Social Cognition in the We-Mode.Mattia Gallotti & Chris Frith - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (4):160-165.
Training, Transformation and Education.David Bakhurst - 2015 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:301-327.
Why Not the First-Person Plural in Social Cognition?Mattia Gallotti - 2013 - Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36 (4):422-423.
Why Not the First-Person Plural in Social Cognition?Mattia Gallotti - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):422-423.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can Brains in Vats Think as a Team?Hans B. Schmid - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (3):201-218.
Collective Intentionality.Deborah Tollefsen - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Collective and Joint Intention.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
Group Mind.Georg Theiner & Wilson Robert - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publications. pp. 401-04.
Naturalism and the Problem of Intentionality.John J. Haldane - 1989 - Inquiry 32 (September):305-22.
Intentionality and Intersubjectivity.Jan Almäng - 2007 - Dissertation, Göteborg University

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-06

Total downloads

79 ( #65,850 of 2,164,583 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #128,912 of 2,164,583 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums