Perspectives on Science 10 (4):523-549 (2002)

Ofer Gal
University of Sydney
: Bereft of the illusion of an epistemic vantage point external to science, what should be our commitment towards the categories, concepts and terms of that very science? Should we, despaired of the possibility to found these concepts on rock bottom, adopt empiricist skepticism? Or perhaps the inexistence of external foundations implies, rather, immunity for scientific ontology from epistemological criticism? Philosophy's "realism debate" died out without providing a satisfactory answer to the dilemma, which was taken over by the neighboring disciplines. The "symmetry principle" of the "StrongProgramme" for the sociology of science-the requirement that truth and error receive the same kind of causal explanations-offered one bold metaphysical answer, under the guise of a methodological decree. Recently, however, it has been argued that this solution is not bold enough, that the social constructivists replaced the naïve presumption of an independent nature which adjudicates our beliefs with a mirror-image presumption of a sui generis society which furnishes these beliefs autonomously. The proper metaphysics for a foundationless epistemology, argues Bruno Latour, is one which grants nature and society, object and subject, equal roles in the success and failure of science and technology; one in which history of society merges with a history of things-in-themselves. The paper analyzes the philosophical and methodological motivations and ramifications of this extraordinary suggestion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361402322288075
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
The Social Construction of What?Ian Hacking - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.Wilfrid S. Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.
Against Constructivism.M. A. Boden - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):84-89.
Radikaler Konstruktivismus Und Konstruktionismus.Hans Jürgen Wendel - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):323 - 352.
Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy.Christine M. Korsgaard - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (Supplement):99-122.
The Metaphysical Realism Debate: What is at Stake?Tadeusz Szubka - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):301-316.
How to Engage with Experimental Practices? Moderate Versus Radical Constructivism.Henk van den Belt - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):201-219.


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #285,151 of 2,439,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,984 of 2,439,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes