Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults

Abstract
We argue against theory-of-mind interpretation of recent false-belief experiments with young infants and explore two other interpretations: enactive and behavioral abstraction approaches. We then discuss the differences between these alternatives.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0093-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
The Language Instinct.Steven Pinker - 1995 - Harper Perennial.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Two Systems for Mindreading?Peter Carruthers - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):141-162.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Infants' Representations of Causation.Stephen Andrew Butterfill - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):126-127.
Do Adults Make a-Not-B Errors in Pointing?Philippe Vindras & Edouard Gentaz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):68-70.
How to Interpret Infant Socio-Cognitive Competence.Tadeusz Wieslaw Zawidzki - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):483-497.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-02

Total downloads

61 ( #85,375 of 2,163,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums