Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults

Abstract
We argue against theory-of-mind interpretation of recent false-belief experiments with young infants and explore two other interpretations: enactive and behavioral abstraction approaches. We then discuss the differences between these alternatives.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0093-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
The Language Instinct.Steven Pinker - 1995 - Harper Perennial.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?David Premack & G. Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):515-629.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The New Hybrids: Continuing Debates on Social Perception.Shaun Gallagher - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 36:452-465.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Infants' Representations of Causation.Stephen Andrew Butterfill - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):126-127.
Do Adults Make a-Not-B Errors in Pointing?Philippe Vindras & Edouard Gentaz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):68-70.
How to Interpret Infant Socio-Cognitive Competence.Tadeusz Wieslaw Zawidzki - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):483-497.
Added to PP index
2012-03-02

Total downloads
61 ( #88,576 of 2,193,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,983 of 2,193,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature