Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):145-169 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue against theory-of-mind interpretation of recent false-belief experiments with young infants and explore two other interpretations: enactive and behavioral abstraction approaches. We then discuss the differences between these alternatives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,248

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining Human Diversity: the Need to Balance Fit and Complexity.Armin W. Schulz - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (2):1-19.
Editorial: Sensory Categories.Yasmina Jraissati - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (3):419-439.
Editorial: Hostile Emotions.Thiemo Breyer - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (2):327-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-02

Downloads
127 (#185,151)

6 months
10 (#468,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shaun Gallagher
University of Memphis

Citations of this work

Two Systems for Mindreading?Peter Carruthers - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):141-162.
Pragmatic Development and the False Belief Task.Evan Westra - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):235-257.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations