Cambridge University Press (1994)
The employment of mythological language and imagery by an Epicurean poet - an adherent of a system not only materialist, but overtly hostile to myth and poetry - is highly paradoxical. This apparent contradiction has often been ascribed to a conflict in the poet between reason and intellect, or to a desire to enliven his philosophical material with mythological digressions. This book attempts to provide a more positive assessment of Lucretius' aims and methodology by considering the poet's attitude to myth, and the role which it plays in the De Rerum Natura, against the background of earlier and contemporary views. The author suggests that Lucretius was not only aware of the tension between his two roles as philosopher and poet, but attempted to resolve it by developing his own, Epicurean poetic, together with a bold and innovative theory of the origins and meaning of myth.
|Keywords||Didactic poetry, Latin History and criticism Mythology, Classical, in literature Philosophy, Ancient, in literature Myth in literature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$49.18 new (21% off) $49.29 used (21% off) $54.76 direct from Amazon (12% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||PA6484.G35 1994|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Failure of Lucretius.Ledger William Allan Crawley - 1963 - [Auckland, N.Z.]University of Auckland.
The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius.Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Five, Lines 772-1104.Gordon Lindsay Campbell - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius.James H. Nichols - 1976 - Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #205,443 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?