R. M. Adams’s Theodicy of Grace

Philo 1 (1):36-44 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

R. M. Adams’s essay, “Must God Create the Best?” can be interpreted as offering a theodicy for God’s creating morally less perfect beings than he could have created. By creating these morally less perfect beings, God is bestowing grace upon them, which is an unmerited or undeserved benefit. He does so, however, in advance of the free moral misdeeds that render them undeserving. This requires that God have middle knowledge, pace Adams’s version of the Free Will Theodicy, of what would result from his actualization of possible free persons. It is argued that God’s possession of such middle knowledge negates the freedom of created beings, since God completely determines every action of every created person. And since they are not free, they cannot qualify as morally unmeritorious or undeserving. And, with that, Adams’s theodicy of grace-in-advance collapses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The grace we are owed: Human rights and divine duties.James B. Gould - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):261-275.
Robert Adams and the Best Possible World.Mark L. Thomas - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):252-259.
Moral Evil, Freedom and the Goodness of God: Why Kant Abandoned Theodicy.Sam Duncan - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):973-991.
Swinburne on providence.Richard M. Gale - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):209-219.
The free will theodicy.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (4):457-470.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
42 (#280,507)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references