The poetry and the pity: Hume's account of tragic pleasure

British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I defend Hume's account of tragic pleasure against various objections. I examine his account of the emotions in order to clarify his "conversion theory". I also argue that Hume does not give us a theory of tragedy as an aesthetic genre, but rather elucidates the felt experience of a particular work of tragedy. I offer a partial reading of King Lear by way of illustration. Finally, I suggest that the experiences of aesthetic pleasure, and aesthetic sadness, share certain qualities. "Tragic pleasure" is possible, in part, because the pity of tragedy is realised through the pleasure of the aesthetic.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,662

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tragedy and Truth in Heidegger and Jaspers.Jennifer Anna Gosetti - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):301-314.
Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Ferrari - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):181 - 198.
Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Ferrari - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):181-198.
Tragedy and Reparation.Elisa Galgut - 2009 - In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The Positive Function of Evil. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Paradox of Painful Art.Aaron Smuts - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.
A Theory of Tragic Experience According to Hegel.Julia Peters - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):85-106.
The Pleasures of Documentary Tragedy.Stacie Friend - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):184-198.


Added to PP

198 (#62,981)

6 months
1 (#420,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elisa Galgut
University of Cape Town

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references