The Two Sides of Mimesis: Girards Mimetic Theory, Embodied Simulation and Social Identification

Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (4):21-44 (2009)
Abstract
Crucial in Girard's Mimetic Theory is the notion of mimetic desire, viewed as appropriative mimicry, the main source of aggressiveness and violence characterizing our species. The intrinsic value of the objects of our desire is not as relevant as the fact that the very same objects are the targets of others' desire. One could in principle object against such apparently negative and one-sided view of mankind, in general, and of mimesis, in particular. However, such argument would misrepresent Girard's thought. Girard himself acknowledged that mimetic desire is also good in itself, because is at the basis of love, and even more importantly because it's the opening out of oneself. Starting from the notion of desire as openness to others I will discuss from a neuroscientific perspective the implications for social cognition of mimesis against the background of Girard's Mimetic Theory, an ideal starting framework to foster a multidisciplinary approach to the study of human intersubjectivity. It will be posited that a different, not mutually exclusive, account of mimesis leads to social identification henceforth to sociality. Mimesis is neither good or bad, but has the potentials to lead not only to mimetic violence but also to the most creative aspects of human cognition. Results of empirical research in neuroscience and developmental psychology show that such account of mimesis finds solid supporting evidence. It will be concluded that a thorough and biologically plausible account of human intersubjectivity requires the integration of both sides of mimesis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,153
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

El Gran Teatro Del Mundo.Emilio Mordini - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):37-38.
Nursing Intuition: A Valid Form of Knowledge.Catherine Green - 2012 - Nursing Philosophy 13 (2):98-111.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is so Special About Embodied Simulation?Vittorio Gallese & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (11):512-519.
Plato's Mimetic Art.Gene Fendt - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:239-252.
A Critique of Embodied Simulation.Shannon Spaulding - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):579-599.
What is Mimetic Desire?Paisley Nathan Livingston - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):291 – 305.
Before and Below 'Theory of Mind': Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition.Vittorio Gallese - 2007 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 362 (1480):659-669.
Mimesis and Expression in Ayn Rand's Theory of Art.Kirsti Minsaas - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (1):19 - 56.
Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. [REVIEW]Vittorio Gallese - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):23-48.
Triadic Bodily Mimesis is the Difference.Jordan Zlatev, Tomas Persson & Peter Gärdenfors - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):720-721.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total downloads
33 ( #200,444 of 2,308,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #165,159 of 2,308,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature