Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):333-353 (2008)

Authors
Mihai Ganea
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
Michael Dummett's argument for intuitionism can be criticized for the implicit reliance on the existence of what might be called absolutely undecidable statements. Neil Tennant attacks epistemic optimism, the view that there are no such statements. I expose what seem serious flaws in his attack, and I suggest a way of defending the use of classical logic in arithmetic that circumvents the issue of optimism. I would like to thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments. CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007, 2008
DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkm043
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reflecting on Incompleteness.Solomon Feferman - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):1-49.
Conceptions of Truth in Intuitionism.Panu Raatikainen - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2):131--45.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
87 ( #105,975 of 2,330,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #255,600 of 2,330,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes