Actuality and Necessity

Journal of Critical Analysis 9 (2):35-40 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent contribution to the discussion of the necessary and the apriori, Philip Kitcher claims that "appropriate insertion of 'actual' and 'actually' can yield a necessary true sentence from anyl true sentence." The general thrust of Kitcher's discussion is the denial of the equivalence of necessity and apriority. I do not discuss any of the epistemological issues that are discussed by Kitcher. The focus of this paper is on the above quoted claim. What follows illustrate my reasons for doubting the correctness of this claim.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theories of truth and convention T.Douglas Patterson - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-16.
Questions in Two-Dimensional Logic.Thom van Gessel - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):859-879.
Kitcher, Mathematics, and Apriority.Jeffrey W. Roland - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (3):687-702.
Hegel’s Logic of Actuality.Karen Ng - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
On what is a priori about necessities.Jens Kipper - 2018 - Analysis 78 (2):235-243.
The Vicious Triangle of A Priori Truth, Contingent Truth, and Logical Truth.Isidora Stojanovic - 2009 - In Christian Nimtz, Nikola Kompa & Christian Suhm (eds.), A Priori Justification and Its Role in Philosophy. Berlin: Mentis Verlag. pp. 69-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
56 (#293,202)

6 months
4 (#863,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references