A comment on McCall

Analysis 72 (2):293-295 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Storrs McCall claims to have a novel solution to the age-old problem of the incompatibility of free will and God's omniscience. His solution is based on the thesis of the supervenience of truth on being. I argue that this thesis plays no role in solving the ancient conundrum

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

McCall’s Gödelian Argument is Invalid.Panu Raatikainen - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.
Comment on Doctor Mccall’s Paper.John W. Stafford - 1952 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 26:90-93.
Comment on Father Ashley’s Paper.Robert J. Mccall - 1952 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 26:194-198.
On Turing machines knowing their own gödel-sentences.Neil Tennant - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):72-79.
God’s lottery.Storrs McCall & D. M. Armstrong - 1989 - Analysis 49 (4):223 - 224.
An Essay on Free Will. [REVIEW]Storrs McCall - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):663-680.
On "seeing" the truth of the Godel sentence.Storrs McCall - 2001 - Facta Philosophica 3 (1):25-30.
A Non-Classical Theory of Truth, with an Application to Intuitionism.Storrs McCall - 1970 - American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1):83 - 88.
If, Since And Because.Storrs Mccall - 1983 - Logique Et Analyse 26 (September):309-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-17

Downloads
69 (#232,145)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do God's Beliefs about the Future Depend on the Future?T. Ryan Byerly - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:124-9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references