Agitating for Munificence or Going Out of Business: Philosophy’s Dilemma

Susan Gardner
Capilano University
Philosophy has a dirty little secret and it is this: a whole lot of philosophers have swallowed the mechanistic billiard ball deterministic view of human action—presumably because philosophy assumes that science demands it, and/or because modern attempts to articulate in what free will consists seem incoherent. This below-the-surface-purely-academic commitment to mechanistic determinism is a dirty little secret because an honest public commitment would render virtually all that is taught in philosophy departments incomprehensible. Can “lovers of wisdom” really continue to tolerate such a heavy burden of hypocrisy? For it is maximally hypocritical, is it not, to teach ethics, or existentialism, or political philosophy, or critical thinking, or indeed to teach anything at all if one views the bodies of humans as entities determined by forces that are describable entirely under the auspices of physical/chemical laws. The only option, it would seem, to avoid such hypocrisy is to go out of business. After all, either base metal can be turned into gold, or it cannot. We found out long ago that it cannot, and so alchemy was rightly banished into the dustbin of history. Likewise, either philosophy can enhance the wisdom quotient of its disciples as its name implies, and thus override billiard ball mechanics, or it cannot. And if it cannot, it deserves to follow alchemy to an ignominious end.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Agitating for Munificence or Going Out of Business.Susan T. Gardner - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:21-29.
The Challenge of Introducing Critical Thinking in the Business Curriculum.Joseph Castellano, Susan Lightle & Bud Baker - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (3):13-26.
Is Business Ethics Getting Better? A Historical Perspective.Joanne B. Ciulla - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (2):335-343.
The Altruists' Dilemma.Colin Grant - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):315-328.
Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?Bruce Anderson - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):217-219.
Business Ethics at the Millennium.R. Edward Freeman - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):169-180.
Business Ethics, Philosophy, and the Next 25 Years.Norman E. Bowie - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):7-20.
Getting Down to Business.Laura Biron & Dominic Scott - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):71-74.
Punishing Atypical Dirty Hands.Fausto Corvino - 2015 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):281-297.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #933,354 of 2,328,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #346,105 of 2,328,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature