Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):499-513 (2007)
AbstractMoral anti-realism comes in two forms – noncognitivism and the error theory. The noncognitivist says that when we make moral judgments we aren’t even trying to state moral facts. The error theorist says that when we make moral judgments we are making statements about what is objectively good, bad, right, or wrong but, since there are no moral facts, our moral judgments are uniformly false. This development of moral anti-realism was first seriously defended by John Mackie. In this paper I explore a dispute among moral error theorists about how to deal with false moral judgments. The advice of the moral abolitionist is to stop making moral judgments, but the contrary advice of the moral fictionalist is to retain moral language and moral thinking. After clarifying the choice that arises for the moral error theorist, I argue that moral abolitionism has much to recommend it. I discuss Mackie’s defense of moral fictionalism as well as a recent version of the same position offered by Daniel Nolan, Greg Restall, and Caroline West. Then I second some remarks Ian Hinckfuss made in his defense of moral abolitionism and his criticism of “the moral society.” One of the worst things about moral fictionalism is that it undermines our epistemology by promoting a culture of deception. To deal with this problem Richard Joyce offers a “non-assertive” version of moral fictionalism as perhaps the last option for an error theorist who hopes to avoid moral abolitionism. I discuss some of the problems facing that form of moral fictionalism, offer some further reasons for adopting moral abolitionism in our personal lives, and conclude with reasons for thinking that abolishing morality may be an essential step in achieving the goals well-meaning moralists and moral fictionalists have always cherished.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.Simon Blackburn - 1998 - Oxford University Press UK.
Citations of this work
Experimental philosophy and the fruitfulness of normative concepts.Matthew Lindauer - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2129-2152.
Should Morality Be Abolished? An Empirical Challenge to the Argument From Intolerance.Jennifer Cole Wright & Thomas Pölzler - 2022 - Philosophical Psychology 35 (3):350-385.
Modeling Morality.Walter Veit - 2019 - In Matthieu Fontaine, Cristina Barés-Gómez, Francisco Salguero-Lamillar, Lorenzo Magnani & Ángel Nepomuceno-Fernández (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Springer Verlag. pp. 83–102.
Similar books and articles
Nietzsche.Ken Gemes & Christoph Schuringa - 2012 - In Tom Angier (ed.), Ethics: The Key Thinkers. Bloomsbury Academic.
The Complexity of Justice - a Challenge to the 21st Century.Agnes Heller - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):247-262.
Why Moral Error Theorists Should Become Revisionary Moral Expressivists.Toby Svoboda - 2015 - Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-25.
Why Moral Error Theorists Should Become Revisionary Moral Expressivists.Toby Svoboda - 2015 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Abolishing Resale Price Maintenance: Lessons From Sweden.Per I. Gedin - 1993 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 4 (2):84-87.
On the Alleged Inseparability of Morality and Religion.E. D. Klemke - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (1):37 - 48.
Taking Seriously the Challenges of Agent-Centered Morality.Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2011 - JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL WONKWANG CULTURE 2 (1):43-56.
Categorical Pardon: On the Argument for Abolishing Capital Punishment.J. Budziszewski - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 16 (1):43-56.
Abolishing Bakunin: Towards an Anarchist Politics of the Text.Gareth Gordon - 2008 - In Gavin Grindon (ed.), Aesthetics and Radical Politics. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 104.
State, Soul, and Society: The Transformation of Morality and the Modern State.Edward L. Rubin - 2014 - Oup Usa.