Arthur Pap's analysis of necessary propositions

Philosophical Review 59 (3):370-374 (1950)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2181992
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,167
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Belief, Synonymity, and Analysis.Arthur Pap - 1955 - Philosophical Studies 6 (1):11 - 15.
Red and Green All Over Again: A Rejoinder to Arthur Pap.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (January):100-103.
Synonymity and Logical Equivalence.Arthur Pap - 1948 - Analysis 9 (4):51 - 57.
Reply to “Arthur Pap on Meaning Rules”.Arthur Pap - 1960 - Philosophical Studies 11 (3):38 - 41.
Belief and Propositions.Arthur Pap - 1957 - Philosophy of Science 24 (2):123-136.
Are All Necessary Propositions Analytic?Arthur Pap - 1949 - Philosophical Review 58 (4):299-320.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

2 ( #757,659 of 2,153,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,083 of 2,153,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums