Borderless Philosophy 4:1-56 (2021)

Authors
Arran Gare
Swinburne University of Technology
Abstract
One of the most influential recent developments in supposedly radical philosophy is ‘posthumanism’. This can be seen as the successor to ‘deconstructive postmodernism’. In each case, the claim of its proponents has been that cultures are oppressive by virtue of their elitism, and this elitism, fostered by the humanities, is being challenged. In each case, however, these philosophical ideas have served ruling elites by crippling opposition to their efforts to impose markets, concentrate wealth and power and treat everyone and everything as mere instruments in a way that is not only undermining democracy and threatening economic, social and political stability through growing inequality, but is crippling efforts to deal with the global ecological crisis. Philosophers, Nietzsche claimed, are physicians of culture. Why should people claiming to be philosophers, or at least aligned with philosophers, subvert their own calling? In this paper I will suggest that with the expansion of education and the rise of neoliberalism, those involved in education and research, particularly in the humanities and social sciences, have been proletarianized, and most have accepted this proletarianization. They have been reduced to a fraction of the proletariat - wage-slaves without economic security and therefore dependent on the will of others on whom they are dependent. They are not ordinary wage-slaves, however, but wage-house-slaves, having salaries rather than wages. If, as Marx argued, social being determines consciousness, posthumanism can be understood as the expression of ressentiment of these house-slaves at their condition while simultaneously serving to affirm their superiority to field-slaves while serving their masters. Their work is supported because it provides ideological cover for their masters, the new transnational managerial class or corporatocracy as they expand their power through information technology, while absolving this corporatocracy from responsibility for the consequences of their growing power. In making this claim I will argue that the real target of deconstructionists and posthumanists, although this is now seldom appreciated, has been the humanism of the New Left, a revival of the Radical Enlightenment inspired by Renaissance civic humanism and the German Renaissance.
Keywords Posthumanism   Humanism   Marxist humanism   New Left   Neoliberalism   Radical Enlightenment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - Harmondsworth, Penguin.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Knowledge and the Flow of Information.F. Dretske - 1989 - Trans/Form/Ação 12:133-139.
The Structure of Behavior.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1963 - London, U.K.: Beacon Press.

View all 69 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Posthumanism.Neil Badmington (ed.) - 2000 - Palgrave.
Posthumanism and Russian Religious Thought.Jan Krasicki - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (1-2):125-143.
Environmentalism and Posthumanism.Paul B. Thompson - 2013 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 21 (2):63-73.
The Liberal Arts, the Radical Enlightenment and the War Against Democracy.Arran Gare - 2012 - In Luciano Boschiero (ed.), On the Purpose of a University Education. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing Ltd. pp. 67-102.
What is Posthumanism?Cary Wolfe - 2009 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Homo Biotechnologicus.Emil Višňovský - 2015 - Human Affairs 25 (2):230-237.
Deconstruction and Excision in Philosophical Posthumanism.David Roden - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36.
The Posthumanism to Come.Christopher Peterson - 2011 - Angelaki 16 (2):127 - 141.
Posthumanism and the MOOC: Opening the Subject of Digital Education.Jeremy Knox - 2016 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (3):305-320.
Race, Technology, and Posthumanism.Holly Flint Jones & Nicholaos Jones - 2020 - In Mads Rosenthal Thomsen & Jacob Wamberg (eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 161-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-01

Total views
179 ( #59,829 of 2,454,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
179 ( #2,920 of 2,454,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes