Informal Logic 30 (2):122-141 (2010)

Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen
The epistemologists Biro and Siegel have raised two objections against the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. According to the first objection the pragma-dialectical theory is not genuinely normative. According to the second objection the rejection of justificationism by pragma-dialecticians is unwarranted: they reject justificationism prematurely and they are not consistent in accepting some arguments (‘justifications’) as sound. The first objection is based on what we regard as the misconception that the goal of resolving differences of opinion cannot provide a normative approach. In response to the second objection we argue that in pragma-dialectics, the notion of argument, and related notions, are defined in a non-justificatory manner
Keywords Miller  critical rationalism  Münchhausen trilemma  pragma-dialectical approach  objective epistemic approach  justificationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Paradox of Charity.Marcin Lewiński - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (4):403-439.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #495,433 of 2,519,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes