Bundle Theory's Black Box: Gap Challenges for the Bundle Theory of Substance

Philosophia 42 (1):115-126 (2014)
Authors
Robert K. Garcia
Texas A&M University
Abstract
My aim in this article is to contribute to the larger project of assessing the relative merits of different theories of substance. An important preliminary step in this project is assessing the explanatory resources of one main theory of substance, the so-called bundle theory. This article works towards such an assessment. I identify and explain three distinct explanatory challenges an adequate bundle theory must meet. Each points to a putative explanatory gap, so I call them the Gap Challenges. I consider three bundle-theoretic strategies for meeting these challenges. I argue that none of them goes very far. The upshot is that, absent other strategies for meeting the challenges, bundle theory involves a significant amount of stipulation. This black box makes bundle theory relatively weak with respect to its explanatory power—unless, of course, rival theories of substance are unable to do better
Keywords Ontology  Constituent ontology  Substance  Bundle theory  Tropes  Universals
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-013-9466-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

"Bare Particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Logical Parts.L. A. Paul - 2002 - Noûs 36 (4):578–596.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bare Particulars and Constituent Ontology.Robert K. Garcia - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (2):149-159.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can the Bundle Theory Save Substantivalism From the Hole Argument?Glenn Parsons & Patrick McGivern - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S358-.
The Self : A Humean Bundle and/or a Cartesian Substance ?Jiri Benovsky - 2009 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 5 (1):7 - 19.
"Bare Particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Indiscernibility and Bundles in a Structure.Sun Demirli - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):1-18.
Mereological Bundle Theory.L. A. Paul - forthcoming - In Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt & Guido Imaguire (eds.), Handbook of Mereology. Philosophia Verlag.
Temporal Parts and Bundle Theory.Douglas Ehring - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 104 (2):163 - 168.
The Bundle Theory of Substance.Ralph W. Clark - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (4):490-503.
The Bundle Theory of Substance.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1978 - New Scholasticism 52 (1):91-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-12

Total downloads
359 ( #10,183 of 2,263,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #14,727 of 2,263,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature