Descartes and the scientific revolution: Some Kuhnian reflections

Perspectives on Science 9 (4):405-422 (2001)
Abstract
: Important to Kuhn's account of scientific change is the observation that when paradigms are in competition with one another, there is a curious breakdown of rational argument and communication between adherents of competing programs. He attributed this to the fact that competing paradigms are incommensurable. The incommensurability thesis centrally involves the claim that there is a deep conceptual gap between competing paradigms in science. In this paper I argue that in one important case of competing paradigms, the Aristotelian explanation of the properties of bodies in terms of matter and form as opposed to the Cartesian mechanist paradigm, where the properties of bodies are explained on the model of machines, there was no such conceptual gap: the notion of a machine was as fully intelligible on the Aristotelian paradigm as it was on the Cartesian. But this does not mean that the debate between the two sides was conducted on purely rational terms. Rational argument breaks down not because of Kuhnian incommensurability, I argue, but because of other cultural factors separating the two camps
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361401760375802
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,841
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Evolution of the Term "Mixed Mathematics".Gary Brown - 1991 - Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (1):81-102.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Conceptual Transformations.Jeff Coulter - 1995 - Sociological Theory 13 (2):163-177.
Intuitionism as a (Failed) Kuhnian Revolution in Mathematics.B. Pourciau - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):297-329.
Paradigms, Rationality, and Partial Communication.William H. Austin - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 3 (2):203-218.
Is There an Incommensurability Between Superseding Theories? On the Validity of the Incommensurability Thesis.A. Polikarov - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
A Kuhnian Model of Falsifiability.Mark A. Stone - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):177-185.
Ii. A Reply to Siegel on Kuhnian Relativism.Gerald Doppelt - 1980 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):117 – 123.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
134 ( #39,109 of 2,210,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #165,188 of 2,210,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature