Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):203–216 (2007)
There are propositions constituting the content of fictions—sometimes of the utmost importance to understand them—which are not explicitly presented, but must somehow be inferred. This essay deals with what these inferences tell us about the nature of fiction. I will criticize three well-known proposals in the literature: those by David Lewis, Gregory Currie, and Kendall Walton. I advocate a proposal of my own, which I will claim improves on theirs. Most important for my purposes, I will argue on this basis, against Walton’s objections, for an illocutionary-act account of fiction, inspired in part by some of Lewis’s and Currie’s suggestions, but (perhaps paradoxically) above all by Walton’s deservedly influential views
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie.Jukka Mikkonen - 2010 - Disputatio 3 (28):151-157.
Fiction, Fiction-Making, and Styles of Fictionality.Kendall L. Walton - 1983 - Philosophy and Literature 7 (1):78-88.
Works of Fiction and Illocutionary Acts.Gregory Currie - 1986 - Philosophy and Literature 10 (2):304-308.
Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making.Jukka Mikkonen - 2008 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):116-132.
The Semantics of Fictional Names.Fred Adams, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):128–148.
The Realistic Fallacy, Or: The Conception of Literary Narrative Fiction in Analytic Aesthetics.Jukka Mikkonen - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (1):1-18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads104 ( #48,206 of 2,169,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #126,618 of 2,169,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?