Joining Forces Against Neo-Darwinism: Linking Organicism and Biosemiotics

Biosemiotics 14 (1):61-65 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The theoretical biologist Waddington drew attention to the damage to scientific progress by COWDUNG – the Conventional Wisdom of the Dominant Group. Despite Popper’s attack on what he called “the bucket theory of science”, that scientific knowledge accumulates incrementally, adding one fact after another, this is now conventional wisdom among biologists. Denis Noble is challenging not only the Neo-Darwinist orthodoxy dominating biology, but revealing the distortions of science produced by this bucket theory of science. The latter is central to understanding the importance of his argument and for seeing the relevance of his work for biosemiotics.

Similar books and articles

Report on the 19th annual Gathering in Biosemiotics in Moscow.Arran Gare - 2019 - Sign Systems Studies 47 (3-4):627-640.
Joining Sign Science and Life Science.Donald Favareau - 2008 - American Journal of Semiotics 24 (1-3):3-15.


Added to PP

153 (#90,505)

6 months
50 (#35,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arran Gare
Swinburne University of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Against Method.P. Feyerabend - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):331-342.
Objective knowledge, an evolutionary approach.Karl R. Popper - 1976 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 166 (1):72-73.
The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis.Denis Noble - forthcoming - Biosemiotics:1-20.

View all 11 references / Add more references