Nagarjuna and the limits of thought

Philosophy East and West 53 (1):1-21 (2003)
Abstract
: Nagarjuna seems willing to embrace contradictions while at the same time making use of classic reductio arguments. He asserts that he rejects all philosophical views including his own-that he asserts nothing-and appears to mean it. It is argued here that he, like many philosophers in the West and, indeed, like many of his Buddhist colleagues, discovers and explores true contradictions arising at the limits of thought. For those who share a dialetheist's comfort with the possibility of true contradictions commanding rational assent, for Nagarjuna to endorse such contradictions would not undermine but instead confirm the impression that he is indeed a highly rational thinker. It is argued that the contradictions he discovers are structurally analogous to many discovered by Western philosophers and mathematicians
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2003.0004
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nāgārjuna's Catuṣkoṭi.Jan Westerhoff - 2005 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (4):367-395.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
208 ( #21,478 of 2,210,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #80,629 of 2,210,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature