Natural Philosophy and the Sciences: Challenging Science’s Tunnel Vision

Philosophies 3 (4):33-0 (2018)
Authors
Arran Gare
Swinburne University of Technology
Abstract
Prior to the nineteenth century, those who are now regarded as scientists were referred to as natural philosophers. With empiricism, science was claimed to be a superior form of knowledge to philosophy, and natural philosophy was marginalized. This claim for science was challenged by defenders of natural philosophy, and this debate has continued up to the present. The vast majority of mainstream scientists are comfortable in the belief that through applying the scientific method, knowledge will continue to accumulate, and that claims to knowledge outside science apart from practical affairs should not be taken seriously. This is referred to as scientism. It is incumbent on those who defend natural philosophy against scientism not only to expose the illusions and incoherence of scientism, but to show that natural philosophers can make justifiable claims to advancing knowledge. By focusing on a recent characterization and defense of natural philosophy along with a reconstruction of the history of natural philosophy, showing the nature and role of Schelling’s conception of dialectical thinking, I will attempt to identify natural philosophy as a coherent tradition of thought and defend it as something different from science and as essential to it, and essential to the broader culture and to civilization.
Keywords natural philosophy  R.M. Unger  L. Smolin  Aristotle  F.W.J. Schelling  Naturphilosophie  A.N. Whitehead  Ivor Leclerc  dialectics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Health Science, Natural Science, and Clinical Knowledge.R. John Bench - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):147-164.
Methodological Problems of Natural Science.B. M. Kedrov - 1964 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 3 (2):3-14.
On Materialism in Natural Science.Hu Wen-Keng - 1974 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 5 (3):35-68.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Leon Horsten - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paradigms and Possibilities.Graham McFee - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):58 – 77.
The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages.Edward Grant - 2010 - Catholic University of America Press.
The Social Ingredients in All Ways of Acquiring Reliable Knowledge.Rom Harre - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):67-77.
Realism 'Naturalized'? [REVIEW]Georg Theiner - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (1):247-255.
Natural Experiments and Pluralism in Political Science.Sharon Crasnow - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):424-441.
V. I. Lenin on the Dialectics of the Development of Natural Science.B. M. Kedrov - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (3):231-239.
Is Philosophy a 'Theory of Everything'?G. M. K. Hunt - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 33:219-231.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-27

Total views
18 ( #365,564 of 2,313,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,353 of 2,313,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature