Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1985)

Authors
Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris
Abstract
Wittgenstein's views on mathematics are radically original. He criticizes most of the traditional philosophies of mathematics. His views have been subject to harsh criticisms. In this dissertation, I attempt to defend Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics from two objections: the objectivity objection and the consistency objection. The first claims that Wittgenstein's account of mathematics is not sufficient for the objectivity of mathematics; the second claims that it is only a partial account of mathematics because it cannot explain the semantic properties of mathematical systems. ;The first chapter outlines Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics by stressing the differences and similarities with more traditional accounts. The second chapter discusses the objectivity objection. I distinguish epistemic from non-epistemic objectivity and discuss their relation with the issue of realism and anti-realism. I conclude first that either notion of objectivity is insufficient for disparaging anti-realist accounts of mathematics and, second, that Wittgenstein's account is sufficient for both. The third chapter is a detailed discussion of the consistency objection. Some unsuccessful replies are discussed. In the fourth chapter, I reformulate the objection by means of a rather simple axiomatic system that I call theory T. This allows us to see more clearly why the replies considered before are not successful and, furthermore, which view Wittgenstein is actually required to hold in order to reject the objection. In the fifth chapter, I offer a brief outline of Wittgenstein's account of logic and, finally, show how it provides the required answer to the consistency objection.
Keywords Wittgenstein  Philosophy of Mathematics  mathematical realism  conventionalism  consistency objection  objectivity objection
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,110
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics.Pieranna Garavaso - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):179-191.
Some Objections to Putnam’s “Consistency Objection”.John A. Humphrey - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:127-141.
Wittgenstein's Anti-Platonism.Sílvio Pinto - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 56 (1):109-132.
Wittgenstein and Strong Mathematical Verificationism.Cyrus Panjvani - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):406–425.
Wittgenstein on Pure and Applied Mathematics.Ryan Dawson - 2014 - Synthese 191 (17):4131-4148.
Intuitionistic Mathematics and Wittgenstein.Wenceslao J. Gonzalez - 1991 - History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):167-183.
Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Mathematics.Michael Beaumont Wrigley - 1987 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Wittgenstein on the Philosophy of Mathematics.Raymond Haig Melkom - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
12 ( #783,033 of 2,448,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,143 of 2,448,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes