On an incorrect understanding of tarskian truth definitions

Philosophical Issues 8:45-56 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Criticism of Soames' understanding of Tarskian theories of truth.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/1522993

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gómez-Torrente on Modality and Tarskian Logical Consequence.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):159-170.
What is a tarskian definition of truth?-Carpintero Manuel García - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (2):113-144.
What Is a Tarskian Definition of Truth?Manuel García-Carpintero - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (2):113 - 144.
The enumerative character of Tarski's definition of truth and its general character in a Tarskian system.Bo Mou - 2001 - Synthese 126 (1-2):91 - 121.
Truth, proofs and functions.Jean Fichot - 2003 - Synthese 137 (1-2):43 - 58.
Tarskian and Kripkean truth.Volker Halbach - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):69-80.
Truth and meaning.Robert C. Cummins - 2002 - In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 175-197.
Logical truth and tarskian logical truth.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - Synthese 117 (3):375-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#408,165)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Manuel García-Carpintero
Universitat de Barcelona

Citations of this work

How Innocent Is Deflationism?Volker Halbach - 2001 - Synthese 126 (1-2):167-194.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references