Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 55:17-22 (2018)
AbstractHistorically, George Boole’s philosophy of logic has been regarded as the very opposite of Gottlob Frege’s, insofar as Frege is characterized as a strong logical anti-psychologist. Although there are significant differences between Frege’s and Boole’s views on logic, there are also significant similarities, which provide support for our representation of Frege’s philosophy of logic as weakly psychologistic. Both Boole and Frege aspire to capture the essence of a pure and ideally perfect language that may faithfully express correct reasoning, but Boole’s trust in the power of natural language is stronger than Frege’s. Although we cannot adequately defend this claim, we submit that a thorough examination of the differences between Frege’s and Boole’s views on symbolic and natural languages may lead to a more interesting comparison of their stances on logic and thinking than the often repeated contrast in their attitudes toward psychologism.
Similar books and articles
Frege on Thinking and its Epistemic Significance.Pieranna Garavaso & Nicla Vassallo - 2014 - Lexington Books.
La depsicologizzazione della logica. Un confronto tra Boole e Frege.Nicla Vassallo - 1995 - Franco Angeli.
Logic, Thinking and Language in Frege.Daniele Mezzadri - 2017 - Paradigmi. Rivista di Critica Filosofica 3 (3):165-180.
Psychologism in Logic: Some Similarities Between Boole and Frege.Nicla Vassallo - 2000 - In J. Gasser (ed.), A Boole Anthology. Recent and Classical Studies in the Logic of George Boole. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frege on Anti‐Psychologism and the Role of Logic in Thinking.Thomas Lockhart - 2016 - Theoria 82 (4):302-328.
Frege and the Resolution Calculus.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (2):95-108.
Departing From Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language.Mark Sainsbury - 2002 - Routledge.
The Birth of Semantics.Richard Kimberly Heck & Robert C. May - 2020 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (6):1-31.
Boole on Reference and Universe of Discourse: Reply to John Corcoran.O. Chateaubriand - 2004 - Manuscrito 27 (1):173-182.
Gottlob Frege — Language As Ideal Notation.Marek Maciejczak - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (2):63-78.
Frege on Thinking and Thoughts: Pieranna Garavaso and Nicla Vassallo: Frege on Thinking and its Epistemic Significance. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015, Viii+128 Pp, US $83 HB. [REVIEW]Thorsten Sander - 2017 - Metascience 27 (1):127-129.
Gottlob Frege Und Rudolf Eucken—Gesprächspartner in der Herausbildungsphase der Modernen Logik.Uwe Dathe - 1995 - History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (2):245-255.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.