On the Links between Language and Thinking

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 55:17-22 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Historically, George Boole’s philosophy of logic has been regarded as the very opposite of Gottlob Frege’s, insofar as Frege is characterized as a strong logical anti-psychologist. Although there are significant differences between Frege’s and Boole’s views on logic, there are also significant similarities, which provide support for our representation of Frege’s philosophy of logic as weakly psychologistic. Both Boole and Frege aspire to capture the essence of a pure and ideally perfect language that may faithfully express correct reasoning, but Boole’s trust in the power of natural language is stronger than Frege’s. Although we cannot adequately defend this claim, we submit that a thorough examination of the differences between Frege’s and Boole’s views on symbolic and natural languages may lead to a more interesting comparison of their stances on logic and thinking than the often repeated contrast in their attitudes toward psychologism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

14 (#1,018,837)

6 months
12 (#243,520)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nicla Vassallo
Università degli Studi di Genova
Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references