Psychoanalysis and the personal/sub-personal distinction

Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119 (2000)
Abstract
This paper attempts in the first instance to clarify the application of the personal/sub-personal distinction to psychoanalysis and to indicate how this issue is related to that of psychoanalysis" epistemology. It is argued that psychoanalysis may be regarded either as a form of personal psychology, or as a form of jointly personal and sub-personal psychology, but not as a form of sub-personal psychology. It is further argued that psychoanalysis indicates a problem with the personal/sub-personal distinction itself as understood by Dennett A revised view of the distinction, which is argued to reflect its true metaphysical significance, is proposed
Keywords Personal  Psychoanalysis  Science  Sub-personal  Dennett, D
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13869790008520983
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and Human Interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1978 - Heinemann Educational.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

133 ( #33,776 of 2,146,279 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #107,101 of 2,146,279 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums